Page 1 of 1

Re: Bell, Book and Candle (1958) ruined for me

Posted: September 24th, 2013, 8:34 pm
by JackFavell
Hahahahahahahahaha! That's too funny, Masha!

Perhaps Pyewacket is actually a human she turned into a cat?

It's just a thought.

Re: Bell, Book and Candle (1958) ruined for me

Posted: September 25th, 2013, 6:11 am
by JackFavell
Oh Masha, I think you have captured the philosophy of a cat owner only too well.

I used to own two cats before I became allergic to them, and would wake to find them just in the process of knocking an Orrefors vase(or equally sentimental or valuable item) off the shelves. I am convinced that they come to wake you up in order to witness first hand the destruction of your things, but without enough time to do anything about it.

Re: Bell, Book and Candle (1958) ruined for me

Posted: September 26th, 2013, 8:08 am
by moira finnie
Masha, you are so droll!

I always thought that Pyewacket controlled everything that happens in Bell, Book and Candle--not the mere humans--none of whom seem as sophisticated or aware of the black arts as that Siamese wizard of necromancy.

Re: Bell, Book and Candle (1958) ruined for me

Posted: September 27th, 2013, 8:07 am
by JackFavell
That was really brilliant Masha, I want to go back and watch again, with the insights you and Moira wrote about in mind.

Re: Bell, Book and Candle (1958) ruined for me

Posted: December 29th, 2013, 11:36 pm
by mrsl
,
Masha:

It may help you to know that I've always thought Piewacket was a person who returned as a cat who emphasized and embellished Gillians' wishes. BTW, I know you were involved in movies in some way, but were you a writer? Your writing form is so very entertaining.
.