by mrsl » Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:50 pm
Although the Western Channel is having a RS tribute on the 30th, they are playing some of the movies scattered throughout the month also. One of these is Ride Lonesome, which has kicked off a discussion over on TCM. It seems that most of the people posting over there nowadays are either younger, or not truly interested in the value of older movies. I may continue on this thought, but first here is my take on Ride Lonesome.
A little more detailed background on the original 'despicable act' would have been helpful but, it would have added too much time to the length of this movie. (I don't want to give away what the 'act' was, as it is a vital part of the plot.) The Boetticher/Scott westerns were all limited to a maximum of one and one-half hours, and even rarely that long.
Scott, a rancher turned bounty hunter, has captured a wanted man, and is taking him to be put on trial, however, knowing the mans' brother is following, he follows a curious route, making his companions wonder what his plan is. There are several sub-plots, but they all tie in to the wanted man, and are all resolved by the end.
Karen Steele was a little too overt in the role as was her costuming, hair and makeup, but, it was the 50's and women just did not appear in front of the camera without every hair in place, and full make-up, even in death scenes, after days in the hospital, let alone out on the prairie.
This is one of my favorite roles from Pernell Roberts. If he could have developed this sort of character in other movies, he may have gone on to bigger and better. A high-toned, nearly educated cowboy who spoke in dulcet tones could easily have made a name for him. He started it in Bonanza, and carried it through on this movie, but never got to do more in any other later films. Having a young, 'dumb as a post' side-kick like Whit (James Coburn in one of his first feature films), added to our amusement as Pernell tolerates Whits' shortcomings with mild exasperation, finally letting us in on the secret, that unknown 'Why' to him . . . he 'likes' Whit. These character nuances endeared me to both of them.
As in all Boetticher/Scott collaborations, Scott has a scene in which he explains his actions and reactions, letting his companions in on his brusque and seemingly vicious attitude, thereby informing them of his sense of right vs. wrong. This scene usually involves a short summary of his life up to this point in time, thus rallying his detractors to his cause, as in this case with both Ms. Steele and Roberts.
I find this to be one of my favorite Scott westerns because of the various personalities all in contention with one another, yet coming together at the end. The final scene, of Steele, Roberts, and Coburn, riding away and looking back at the smoke was a great finish.
Lately, TCM posters seem to have a feeling of personal affront to many of the movies shown, (and I don't just mean the 'gay' themed ones). I'm probably wrong, but they seem to take the teen movies, drama and film noir as 'in your face' assaults. Actors are rarely discussed. . . more the content of the film plot, with reference to real vs. reel. I may be reading more into this than I should, but whenever I click over there, I rarely find anything that I care to respond to, and for some reason, the discussion on this particular film brought a lot to my attention. I could be reading between the lines - what do the rest of you think?
Anne
Anne
***********************************************************************
* * * * * * * * What is past is prologue. * * * * * * * *
]***********************************************************************