WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Chit-chat, current events
User avatar
EP Millstone
Posts: 1048
Joined: October 20th, 2022, 9:40 am
Location: The Western Hemisphere

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by EP Millstone »

laffite wrote: February 21st, 2023, 5:52 am Utter rubbish!

No movie is superfluous.
Wrong . . . again!
Image

"Start every day off with a smile and get it over with." -- W.C. Fields
User avatar
laffite
Posts: 2295
Joined: October 27th, 2022, 10:43 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by laffite »

kingrat wrote: February 22nd, 2023, 11:36 am Hoop Dreams (1994) is impressive. Not sure why I didn't see this when it first came out. Two African-American basketball players who dream of playing in the NBA are recruited by a suburban high school outside Chicago. Isiah Thomas played there, and one of the youths is compared favorably to Thomas. Both players live in inner-city housing projects, one in the notorious Cabrini-Green. The documentary follows their lives through high school, on court and off. Voiceover carries us through the gaps in time. Significant events happen offscreen.

Because the film doesn't set out to make political points, the problems and realities faced by the students and their families emerge all the more strongly. Prominent college coaches of the time, including Bobby Knight, Duke's Coach K, and Dick Vitale, are seen watching the players. The white high school coach is a jerk in the Bobby Knight tradition, though he probably sincerely believes he is helping his team grow up. Perhaps this is still common among coaches.

Wikipedia has extensive coverage of how the Oscar panel for documentaries managed to prevent Hoop Dreams from being nominated for Best full-length Documentary. It probably also should have been nominated for Best Picture.
A few year before came A Mother's Courage : The Mary Thomas Story, a TV-movie which as indicated follows the rigors that Isaiah' mother endured in making sure that her nine children would not break bad in a tough neighborhood. An emphasis was given to Isaiah as one might expect but appropriately so, not to upstage his mother. Alfre Woodard is splendid in the title role.
"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright moron" ===H.L. Mencken (1880=1956)
User avatar
Andree
Posts: 982
Joined: January 21st, 2023, 4:24 pm
Location: Balbec

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by Andree »

I've seen Hoop Dreams once or twice before. While it isn't overtly political, you don't have to drill down very far to
see some political themes, though this isn't the place for such a discussion. The good news is that while Arthur and William
didn't come close to playing in the NBA, the filmmakers gave them a nice chunk of change after college and their lives have
turned out to be successful and fulfilling. A good post-documentary ending that wasn't always assured in the documentary.
Every man has a right to an umbrella.~Dostoyevsky
User avatar
laffite
Posts: 2295
Joined: October 27th, 2022, 10:43 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by laffite »

Just noticed a mention in the NYT movie section the 1988 Claire Denis movie entitled "Chocolat." It's a French colonial story set in Africa. The mention is because it is playing locally. It has been a fave of mine since its release. The comments in the article are not spoilers.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/22/movi ... denis.html
"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright moron" ===H.L. Mencken (1880=1956)
User avatar
laffite
Posts: 2295
Joined: October 27th, 2022, 10:43 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by laffite »

Moon (2009) The far side of the moon. Lunar Industries is mining an alternate fuel, helium-3, when a massive oil crisis exists on Earth. The station is run by a single man, Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) with the help of Gertie, a Hal-like computer who drags itself around with a chain that has rollers on the ceilings of various compartments of the station.. He has a lilting voice (Kevin Spacey) just like Hal and is completely benevolent helping Sam in any way he can. I would prefer this thing over Hal any old day. Sam runs tests and makes reports, drives a mobile unit to the mines and packs canisters of H3 and sends back to Earth. But he is nearly done with all this. Sam Bell is getting short, as they say, having only two weeks before going home after a three-year tour of duty. Then things begin to unravel.

This is scy-fi that sticks to our own sensibilities. It's futuristic in a most limited sense. There are no extravagant elements, time travel, parallel universes, monster that walk through walls, Sam Bell would probably have the same attitudes towards these things that we do. In other words, it takes place in "real" life. The interior of the station is clever but there is an admirable restraint. I'm sure that Sf buffs know the terms and categories to explain this better. It's like Alien in this way.

There are other credits but Sam Rockwell has 99% of the burden. A wonderful resume item, succeeding as he does not only carrying the film but holding it up like Hercules who has the world on his back. He imbues Sam Bell with an exuberant child-like demeanor that pulled me into the movie. Thank Matt Damon in The Martian, totally opposite. He bobbles around the room to his fave rock n' roll. But not irresponsible or a ne'er do well with his job he is deadly serious but wavering with the events of his life in these last two weeks.

By not telling the story I am then also unable to voice a challenge which threatens the premise of the whole story, A question not to be asked, e.g. The Spoiler function is useless. No one ignores a spoiler alert. I would have to give up the whole story. If perchance a discussion should ensue here and it gets down to the nitty gritty, then anything goes (but sill with a spoiler alert, ha) but I can't say it now.
"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright moron" ===H.L. Mencken (1880=1956)
User avatar
laffite
Posts: 2295
Joined: October 27th, 2022, 10:43 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by laffite »

Eye of the Devil (1966) Oof, I should have known. A horror movie. I was fooled via noting that David Niven and Deborah Kerr were the stars. What could go wrong? It was not immediately clear to me that it was horror. The presence of Deborah Kerr seemed antithetical to that. The title did not make me jump to conclusions. And then we get that room with the people and all the hoodies and the face of a woman who looks like a psycho. But the thing that really killed me was David Niven. "Oh, hello dear, did you bring the children?" Are these kids going to get their eyes plucked out like in RB? When dear wife Deb mentions the hoodie room we get a close up of Niven's face. He attempts to look devious with perhaps a touch of depravity. It didn't work. Niven is slumming in a film like this. He doesn't quite get that you have to look earnest even is a crappy movie like this. If I fielded his audition I would have rejected him straightaway. "Listen, Mr Niven, this movie is below you, please return to your usual high standard. This garbage is not for you."

Okay, so I only watched about 14 minutes. More was not necessary. I have already mentioned in my history how much I dislike horror movies. Even if I didn't I care not a whit for the depiction of children as victims. Of course I now not whether these kids had their eyes plucked out or not. Maybe they were put on a spit and roasted. Then their black bodies put on a stick so all the hoodies can prance around to some crappy music. Bleah!

Please no reviews that tell how good this movie is. I won't be impressed, I'm sure.

Now if you will excuse me, I must return to the Hallmark Channel and see the same love story that is done over and over. Not really I would watch but the channel should be mentioned as the honorable flip side.

:smiley_snoopy: What, 14 minutes. I admire your patience. I was out of there after nine.
"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright moron" ===H.L. Mencken (1880=1956)
User avatar
laffite
Posts: 2295
Joined: October 27th, 2022, 10:43 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by laffite »

Torn Curtain (1966) Starring Paul Newman and Julie Andrews (and a whole lot of other people). A film d'Alfred Hitchcock.

Too long.

//
"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright moron" ===H.L. Mencken (1880=1956)
User avatar
laffite
Posts: 2295
Joined: October 27th, 2022, 10:43 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by laffite »

The Assistant (2019) Found on the DVR list and having not the faintest about it was therefore able to enjoy sans spoilers. Since I had no aforethought anything I say here seems like spoilers since I would not anyone reading this to enjoy it any less than I did so I will say nothing or virtually nothing as is my wont anyway. The lead actress seemed so familiar and soon an Eureka moment ensued, having recognized her as that feisty, hot, pistolette in the TV Series "Ozarks," although I have since read that she appeared in another TV Series "The Americans" where she was noticed and landed by the maker of this film for the lead. And she is good. Interesting film all around, let it unfold afore you with little no cloying manipulation. Enjoy. I guarantee it, that if you look it up first, you will not enjoy it as much, for it would be impossible to do so.
"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright moron" ===H.L. Mencken (1880=1956)
kingrat
Posts: 368
Joined: February 28th, 2024, 5:20 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by kingrat »

I saw Another Man's Poison (1951), which is a favorite of Swithin's, but unfortunately not of mine. It's a stage play not very well turned into a movie. Irving Rapper directed some fine films for Bette Davis, like Now Voyager, The Corn Is Green, and Deception, but his work here is not on the same level. Only a year after her great performance in All About Eve, we have Theatah Bette, as if she'd gone directly from Broadway to Hollywood in 1930. Gary Merrill, the only person who seems to know he's in a film rather than a play, steals every scene and the picture. Merrill has an attractive baritone speaking voice, and though he isn't handsome and has a rather stocky build, his masculine force is very appealing. No wonder Bette married him, though the marriage would have its problems.

Anthony Steel does have conventionally handsome looks, and he is well cast as the man Bette is hot for. The supporting roles are played by English character actors in a stagy manner that both works and seems dated. Emlyn Williams, who plays the veterinarian, will give much finer performances in films like The Wreck of the Mary Deare and The Walking Stick.
User avatar
Swithin
Posts: 2252
Joined: October 22nd, 2022, 5:25 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by Swithin »

kingrat wrote: August 31st, 2024, 1:34 am I saw Another Man's Poison (1951), which is a favorite of Swithin's, but unfortunately not of mine. It's a stage play not very well turned into a movie. Irving Rapper directed some fine films for Bette Davis, like Now Voyager, The Corn Is Green, and Deception, but his work here is not on the same level. Only a year after her great performance in All About Eve, we have Theatah Bette, as if she'd gone directly from Broadway to Hollywood in 1930. Gary Merrill, the only person who seems to know he's in a film rather than a play, steals every scene and the picture. Merrill has an attractive baritone speaking voice, and though he isn't handsome and has a rather stocky build, his masculine force is very appealing. No wonder Bette married him, though the marriage would have its problems.

Anthony Steel does have conventionally handsome looks, and he is well cast as the man Bette is hot for. The supporting roles are played by English character actors in a stagy manner that both works and seems dated. Emlyn Williams, who plays the veterinarian, will give much finer performances in films like The Wreck of the Mary Deare and The Walking Stick.
Kingrat, I don't remember ever having seen Another Man's Poison, much less it being one of my favorites!
kingrat
Posts: 368
Joined: February 28th, 2024, 5:20 pm

Re: WHAT FILMS HAVE YOU SEEN LATELY?

Post by kingrat »

Swithin wrote: August 31st, 2024, 10:39 pm
kingrat wrote: August 31st, 2024, 1:34 am I saw Another Man's Poison (1951), which is a favorite of Swithin's, but unfortunately not of mine. It's a stage play not very well turned into a movie. Irving Rapper directed some fine films for Bette Davis, like Now Voyager, The Corn Is Green, and Deception, but his work here is not on the same level. Only a year after her great performance in All About Eve, we have Theatah Bette, as if she'd gone directly from Broadway to Hollywood in 1930. Gary Merrill, the only person who seems to know he's in a film rather than a play, steals every scene and the picture. Merrill has an attractive baritone speaking voice, and though he isn't handsome and has a rather stocky build, his masculine force is very appealing. No wonder Bette married him, though the marriage would have its problems.

Anthony Steel does have conventionally handsome looks, and he is well cast as the man Bette is hot for. The supporting roles are played by English character actors in a stagy manner that both works and seems dated. Emlyn Williams, who plays the veterinarian, will give much finer performances in films like The Wreck of the Mary Deare and The Walking Stick.
Kingrat, I don't remember ever having seen Another Man's Poison, much less it being one of my favorites!
My apologies, Swithin. I had the memory--not nearly clear enough!--that it was one of someone's favorite Bette Davis movies.
Post Reply