laffite,
Check it out: What are you reading?
Thank you, EP. You are such a help.
Interesting P.O.V., Thompson! Way I see it, usually the more discussions the better it is for a forum . . . which thrives and survives on activity.Thompson wrote: ↑December 21st, 2022, 2:11 pm . . . I’ve noticed that new threads are created by the minute. I would like to see some ease in that. I’m new of course and only know the people from the old board but I don’t think a new thread has to be made for posters to express their opinion on a subject. In other words, I’m for keeping the threads at a minimum.
EP Millstone wrote: ↑December 21st, 2022, 2:58 pm Well . . . only 25 members have voted.
I counted 65 members (ignoring one spammer) who have joined the SSO since October.
It remains to be seen whether the moderators will abide by the principle of "majority rules" when there is a larger "Silent Majority" who didn't vote.
For those who haven't yet voted (and there are hours left), please cast your vote.
. . . of course, not voting is also "casting a vote." The difference being, nonvoters let others make their decisions for them.
One hopes that people are realizing how much simpler a "like" button would be, rather than having many of us using the quote function, responding with various icons and symbols -- or just the word "like: -- to say like. That would make this board a very cumbersome place, and more difficult to navigate. It's simply good practice and sensible strategy to allow a "like" button.