Re: MUSINGS, PONDERINGS, RUMINATIONS AND FANCIES
Posted: January 26th, 2023, 1:12 pm
Did Maria Schell ever not smile?
https://silverscreenoasis.com/oasis3/
Capone was good at branding and it stuck, while other of his contemporaries like Pretty Boy Floyd and Machine Gun Kelly had to settleBronxgirl48 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 12:42 pm For some reason many Europeans (except the Brits, who refer to them as "the continent") whenever they meet an American (on-screen), their response is "Do you live in Chicago? Al Capone, rat-a-tat-tat!" complete with machine gun body language. I too never exactly understood Scarface's "appeal".
I always wondered what George saw in Alice. I mean, he tells Liz "I don't waste my time" but I suppose, being a guy, George needed, well, an "outlet" to quell those lonely nights while waiting for Uncle to move him up the family ladder of success.
Every time somebody mentions Scorcese, I think of this scene:Bronxgirl48 wrote: ↑January 25th, 2023, 10:30 pm Swithin, thanks so much for that Sarris link. Wow! I wonder what he thought of Scorcese.
Andree wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 4:31 pmCapone was good at branding and it stuck, while other of his contemporaries like Pretty Boy Floyd and Machine Gun Kelly had to settleBronxgirl48 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 12:42 pm For some reason many Europeans (except the Brits, who refer to them as "the continent") whenever they meet an American (on-screen), their response is "Do you live in Chicago? Al Capone, rat-a-tat-tat!" complete with machine gun body language. I too never exactly understood Scarface's "appeal".
I always wondered what George saw in Alice. I mean, he tells Liz "I don't waste my time" but I suppose, being a guy, George needed, well, an "outlet" to quell those lonely nights while waiting for Uncle to move him up the family ladder of success.
for second billing, even though they were more eccentric and interesting than Big Al, the 800 pound gorilla of American gangsters.
Yeah, Georgie probably knew a relationship with Liz would take a little time, so he'd have his fun with one of his co-workers, which made
things very convenient. He should have gone to the pharmacist before and not after.
This reminds me of the time my wife and I had purchased BritRail passes and did a big loop through the U.K. back in 1996.Bronxgirl48 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 12:42 pm For some reason many Europeans (except the Brits, who refer to them as "the continent") whenever they meet an American (on-screen), their response is "Do you live in Chicago? Al Capone, rat-a-tat-tat!" complete with machine gun body language.
Or Franklin Pangborn. Don't make me use my feather duster. Robards certainly doesn't look like Al Capone or have hisBronxgirl48 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 6:58 pm
Capone is so iconic you can have virtually anybody portray him. I'm thinking of Jason Robards, Jr. in THE ST. VALENTINE'S DAY MASSACRE. There's probably not a less appropriate looking actor to do so unless maybe it's Wally Cox.
No, and the most pregnant smile that ever was. She gives the smile that smothers. Mawkish and saccharine to he hilt and usually with fluttery blinky eyes. They should make horror movies with that smile.
When I was studying Theology in college, I read Margaret Murray's The Witch-Cult in Western Europe. Murray was a scholar and the first woman to be appointed a lecturer in archeology in the UK. Despite the fact that Murray's theories about the "Dianic Cult" were largely debunked, her work is important because it was the first serious scholarly examination of the witchcraft phenomenon. Similarly, we may not agree with many (or in your case, all) of Sarris's conclusions and categories, but The American Cinema and some of Sarris's other writings were of monumental importance in the furthering of the study of American film as a serious subject for exploration in the United States. So, attention must be paid!kingrat wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 7:36 pm
Swithin, I am not a fan of Andrew Sarris, thumb my nose at his categories, and deeply regret that his mistranslation of the politique des auteurs as the "auteur theory" has received such currency. Otherwise, I'm sure he was a swell guy. From time to time he can say something interesting about a film.
Couldn't disagree more about your views about Stanwyck.Lightly Likeable?? LMREO!!!!Swithin wrote: ↑January 25th, 2023, 10:02 pm Although I mentioned that I'd like to have seen Kate instead of Babs in The Lady Eve, I'm afraid I wouldn't want to get involved in a "Kate vs. Babs" conversation, because I don't think Babs is on Kate's level, and to frame a discussion that way elevates Babs too much.
Kate and Bette are on the same level, but not Babs (though I enjoy many of her movies.)
Here are Andrew Sarris's famous categories for film directors working in America. I think these categories can be used for actors as well. I would place Kate and Bette in the Pantheon; and Babs in Lightly Likable (giving her the benefit of the doubt, because she does do a reasonable job in many important and enjoyable movies, I've decided not to place her in Less Than Meets the Eye.)
Pantheon
Expressive Esoterica
Fringe Benefits
Less Than Meets the Eye
Lightly Likable
Strained Seriousness
Oddities, One-Shots, and Newcomers
Subjects for Further Research
Make Way for the Clowns!
Miscellany
(FYI, here's a link to Sarris's categories and the directors he places in each of them. I certainly don't agree with many of his choices, but at least he's taking a serious and important approach to directors and movies with his rankings.)
https://www.theyshootpictures.com/sarriscategories.htm
OK, so I guess you mean that she should be in "Less Than Meets the Eye" or "Strained Seriousness?" I won't argue about that!Hibi wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 9:14 amCouldn't disagree more about your views about Stanwyck.Lightly Likeable?? LMREO!!!!Swithin wrote: ↑January 25th, 2023, 10:02 pm Although I mentioned that I'd like to have seen Kate instead of Babs in The Lady Eve, I'm afraid I wouldn't want to get involved in a "Kate vs. Babs" conversation, because I don't think Babs is on Kate's level, and to frame a discussion that way elevates Babs too much.
Kate and Bette are on the same level, but not Babs (though I enjoy many of her movies.)
Here are Andrew Sarris's famous categories for film directors working in America. I think these categories can be used for actors as well. I would place Kate and Bette in the Pantheon; and Babs in Lightly Likable (giving her the benefit of the doubt, because she does do a reasonable job in many important and enjoyable movies, I've decided not to place her in Less Than Meets the Eye.)
Pantheon
Expressive Esoterica
Fringe Benefits
Less Than Meets the Eye
Lightly Likable
Strained Seriousness
Oddities, One-Shots, and Newcomers
Subjects for Further Research
Make Way for the Clowns!
Miscellany
(FYI, here's a link to Sarris's categories and the directors he places in each of them. I certainly don't agree with many of his choices, but at least he's taking a serious and important approach to directors and movies with his rankings.)
https://www.theyshootpictures.com/sarriscategories.htm