POLL: Do you want a Like button? Poll has ended!

[scsu1975]

I can't even seem to edit a post without pressing the "quote" button by mistake, thereby creating numerous copies of my post. Who needs that?

Well, I guess we can start another poll to see if we can get rid of the "quote" button."

[EP Millstone]

If you don't enjoy discussing movies, why do you participate in movie discussion boards???

A fair question.

There is more to the SSO than just discussions, e.g., links to essays, articles, publications, profiles, and movies and music; games (although I'm not really a gamer either); news and announcements; Q&A; and most enjoyed by me: humor and wit.

[Swithin]

I can't even seem to edit a post without pressing the "quote" button by mistake, thereby creating numerous copies of my post. Who needs that?

Well, I guess we can start another poll to see if we can get rid of the "quote" button."

[KayFrancis]

I keep hitting the Report button by mistake, sorry about that lol

[LostHorizons]

It isn’t immediately to me either who the other individual is who offended you (the male one). There are lots of people from both sides who contested the poll.

It isn't really important who the other individual is.

When TCM announced the sunsetting, I posted about how, although of course we love to discuss film, it was the impending loss of the community that we built up over the years that I lamented most. There are dozens of sites to discuss films. I chose to join the two boards which promised some continuation of our community, and I favoured this one, because a few of my favourite posters settled here.

I'm not a sensitive creature; I don't take offense easily. It's more a question of disillusionment. Two posters whom I admired, and who were part of the reason I settled on the SSO, behaved badly: the one with a really horrid, nasty post, which was offensive on so many levels; the other with (I felt) an irrational disregard for the election after the fact, which he continued to harp on.

So my point is that the justification I had for coming here has been diminished. I'll see how things go. I absolutely do not understand how an election which expressed desire for something fairly innocuous can be ignored. It would not hurt the minority who voted "no" to add a "like" button which can be used by the majority who voted "yes" and can be ignored by anyone who wants to ignore it.

The "yes" side won the election. The moderators can do as they please; it would just seem to me to be very odd if they did not respect the results. That in conjunction with the fall from my grace of two individuals who were part of my reason for coming here, would make me seriously reconsider whether I wanted to stay here.

My absence would certainly not be a loss for the SSO. I can't even seem to edit a post without pressing the "quote" button by mistake, thereby creating numerous copies of my post. Who needs that?
[/quote]

I think I figured out who you are referring to and I do not see how him changing his mind offends you. People change their minds all the time. Likewise, the other poster apologized for her post. The stuff you are threatening to leave over seems really innocuous to me.

[Swithin]

It isn’t immediately to me either who the other individual is who offended you (the male one). There are lots of people from both sides who contested the poll.

It isn't really important who the other individual is.

When TCM announced the sunsetting, I posted about how, although of course we love to discuss film, it was the impending loss of the community that we built up over the years that I lamented most. There are dozens of sites to discuss films. I chose to join the two boards which promised some continuation of our community, and I favoured this one, because a few of my favourite posters settled here.

I'm not a sensitive creature; I don't take offense easily. It's more a question of disillusionment. Two posters whom I admired, and who were part of the reason I settled on the SSO, behaved badly: the one with a really horrid, nasty post, which was offensive on so many levels; the other with (I felt) an irrational disregard for the election after the fact, which he continued to harp on.

So my point is that the justification I had for coming here has been diminished. I'll see how things go. I absolutely do not understand how an election which expressed desire for something fairly innocuous can be ignored. It would not hurt the minority who voted "no" to add a "like" button which can be used by the majority who voted "yes" and can be ignored by anyone who wants to ignore it.

The "yes" side won the election. The moderators can do as they please; it would just seem to me to be very odd if they did not respect the results. That in conjunction with the fall from my grace of two individuals who were part of my reason for coming here, would make me seriously reconsider whether I wanted to stay here.

My absence would certainly not be a loss for the SSO. I can't even seem to edit a post without pressing the "quote" button by mistake, thereby creating numerous copies of my post. Who needs that?

I think I figured out who you are referring to and I do not see how him changing his mind offends you. People change their minds all the time. Likewise, the other poster apologized for her post. The stuff you are threatening to leave over seems really innocuous to me.
[/quote]

That was no apology. Look at it again. Regarding the male poster, of course people can change their mind. But to disrespect an election and think of all kinds of reasons to criticize it, after it has taken place and a result exists, is not right. And it just happens to be a poster I had a very high regard for on the old board, which is why it saddens me.

But nor is it right for me to "threaten" to leave. I'll go if/when I'm ready, no one needs to hear my whinging over that; And I would look in on occasion.


This has been a mean-spirited discussion, on all our parts, but particularly mean-spirited on the part of the minority, who lost the election. A couple of those posters are people whom I've respected in the past. Give us our damn "like" button, we voted for it; and let the losing side in the election -- particularly the two people whom I've always had a high regard for -- concede graciously.

(Sorry about the font size of my post. It's difficult here, after a few levels of quoting, to differentiate between responses, so the size thing helps.)

[LostHorizons]

It isn’t immediately to me either who the other individual is who offended you (the male one). There are lots of people from both sides who contested the poll.

It isn't really important who the other individual is.

When TCM announced the sunsetting, I posted about how, although of course we love to discuss film, it was the impending loss of the community that we built up over the years that I lamented most. There are dozens of sites to discuss films. I chose to join the two boards which promised some continuation of our community, and I favoured this one, because a few of my favourite posters settled here.

I'm not a sensitive creature; I don't take offense easily. It's more a question of disillusionment. Two posters whom I admired, and who were part of the reason I settled on the SSO, behaved badly: the one with a really horrid, nasty post, which was offensive on so many levels; the other with (I felt) an irrational disregard for the election after the fact, which he continued to harp on.

So my point is that the justification I had for coming here has been diminished. I'll see how things go. I absolutely do not understand how an election which expressed desire for something fairly innocuous can be ignored. It would not hurt the minority who voted "no" to add a "like" button which can be used by the majority who voted "yes" and can be ignored by anyone who wants to ignore it.

The "yes" side won the election. The moderators can do as they please; it would just seem to me to be very odd if they did not respect the results. That in conjunction with the fall from my grace of two individuals who were part of my reason for coming here, would make me seriously reconsider whether I wanted to stay here.

My absence would certainly not be a loss for the SSO. I can't even seem to edit a post without pressing the "quote" button by mistake, thereby creating numerous copies of my post. Who needs that?

I think I figured out who you are referring to and I do not see how him changing his mind offends you. People change their minds all the time. Likewise, the other poster apologized for her post. The stuff you are threatening to leave over seems really innocuous to me.

That was no apology. Look at it again. Regarding the male poster, of course people can change their mind. But to disrespect an election and think of all kinds of reasons to criticize it, after it has taken place and a result exists, is not right. And it just happens to be a poster I had a very high regard for on the old board, which is why it saddens me.

But nor is it right for me to "threaten" to leave. I'll go if/when I'm ready, no one needs to hear my whinging over that; And I would look in on occasion.


This has been a mean-spirited discussion, on all our parts, but particularly mean-spirited on the part of the minority, who lost the election. A couple of those posters are people whom I've respected in the past. Give us our damn "like" button, we voted for it; and let the losing side in the election -- particularly the two people whom I've always had a high regard for -- concede graciously.

(Sorry about the font size of my post. It's difficult here, after a few levels of quoting, to differentiate between responses, so the size thing helps.)
[/quote]

On one point I agree. This has all been a mean spirited discussion and the like button won. Just give the button, I say.

[LostHorizons]

On one point I agree. This has all been a mean spirited discussion and the like button won. Just give the button, I say.

[Swithin]

Have a very Merry Christmas everyone!

[ElCid]

It isn’t immediately to me either who the other individual is who offended you (the male one). There are lots of people from both sides who contested the poll.

This is what Cuthbert posted not me. Once again I managed to foul up quoting someone.
It isn't really important who the other individual is.

When TCM announced the sunsetting, I posted about how, although of course we love to discuss film, it was the impending loss of the community that we built up over the years that I lamented most. There are dozens of sites to discuss films. I chose to join the two boards which promised some continuation of our community, and I favoured this one, because a few of my favourite posters settled here.

I'm not a sensitive creature; I don't take offense easily. It's more a question of disillusionment. Two posters whom I admired, and who were part of the reason I settled on the SSO, behaved badly: the one with a really horrid, nasty post, which was offensive on so many levels; the other with (I felt) an irrational disregard for the election after the fact, which he continued to harp on.

So my point is that the justification I had for coming here has been diminished. I'll see how things go. I absolutely do not understand how an election which expressed desire for something fairly innocuous can be ignored. It would not hurt the minority who voted "no" to add a "like" button which can be used by the majority who voted "yes" and can be ignored by anyone who wants to ignore it.

The "yes" side won the election. The moderators can do as they please; it would just seem to me to be very odd if they did not respect the results. That in conjunction with the fall from my grace of two individuals who were part of my reason for coming here, would make me seriously reconsider whether I wanted to stay here.

My absence would certainly not be a loss for the SSO. I can't even seem to edit a post without pressing the "quote" button by mistake, thereby creating numerous copies of my post. Who needs that?
[/quote]

[ElCid]

It isn’t immediately to me either who the other individual is who offended you (the male one). There are lots of people from both sides who contested the poll.

It isn't really important who the other individual is.

When TCM announced the sunsetting, I posted about how, although of course we love to discuss film, it was the impending loss of the community that we built up over the years that I lamented most. There are dozens of sites to discuss films. I chose to join the two boards which promised some continuation of our community, and I favoured this one, because a few of my favourite posters settled here.

I'm not a sensitive creature; I don't take offense easily. It's more a question of disillusionment. Two posters whom I admired, and who were part of the reason I settled on the SSO, behaved badly: the one with a really horrid, nasty post, which was offensive on so many levels; the other with (I felt) an irrational disregard for the election after the fact, which he continued to harp on.

So my point is that the justification I had for coming here has been diminished. I'll see how things go. I absolutely do not understand how an election which expressed desire for something fairly innocuous can be ignored. It would not hurt the minority who voted "no" to add a "like" button which can be used by the majority who voted "yes" and can be ignored by anyone who wants to ignore it.

The "yes" side won the election. The moderators can do as they please; it would just seem to me to be very odd if they did not respect the results. That in conjunction with the fall from my grace of two individuals who were part of my reason for coming here, would make me seriously reconsider whether I wanted to stay here.

My absence would certainly not be a loss for the SSO. I can't even seem to edit a post without pressing the "quote" button by mistake, thereby creating numerous copies of my post. Who needs that?

[/quote]


OK, I assume you are referring to me as the male?

This was not an election and there are no standards for winning or losing - that is up to the Administrators to determine. It was a recommendation by one new member who then created a poll to garner support for his recommendation. It in effect failed to gain overwhelming support, but did gain serious opposition.

There is no rule that states that the site Administrators must bow down to a poll result or recommendations from some members.

No one "won." Which means that the conversation can continue on, as you have also chosen to do.

I am sorry that this issue has caused you to consider leaving here and I hope that you, and others, do not.

Happy Holidays!

[Swithin]

[/quote]
[/quote]


OK, I assume you are referring to me as the male?

This was not an election and there are no standards for winning or losing - that is up to the Administrators to determine. It was a recommendation by one new member who then created a poll to garner support for his recommendation. It in effect failed to gain overwhelming support, but did gain serious opposition.

There is no rule that states that the site Administrators must bow down to a poll result or recommendations from some members.

No one "won." Which means that the conversation can continue on, as you have also chosen to do.

I am sorry that this issue has caused you to consider leaving here and I hope that you, and others, do not.

Happy Holidays!
[/quote]

Yes, it's you ElCid. Your comments were harder for me to take, not because I disagree with you about the "like" button, but because I have long admired your well-reasoned comments.

The Moderator (Lomm) stated that, although disinclined to add a "like" button, if someone wanted to do a poll, "Go for it." The Moderator has already made some changes to the site, in various areas, based on just one member's suggestions. Here we have a poll, which gave all those interested an opportunity to weigh in, and enough time to consider the matter.

The thing I don't understand is why the meanness (and in one poster's case, the downright rabid nastiness) in opposing a "like" button? It would be there for those who want to use it; others can ignore it. I think the issue may be that certain people see it as an unnatural need for certain posters to garner "likes," whereas many of us see it as simply a logical way to express agreement, in those circumstances when we are not motivated, for whatever reason, to post text. Sometimes, it's just a leaner and more sensible method, and it doesn't (contrary to the views of certain people) discourage conversation.

Another Mod -- Movieman1957 -- stated that this board has managed to carry on without a "like" button since its inception. But the board is changing, and the willingness of the mods to recognize that, has been apparent. Adding a "like" button would be part of that evolution. Also, the quoting function here is cumbersome and confusing. One often doesn't know where the original poster's comments leave off, and the quoted response begins, a problem which is very confusing when there are multiple responders. That's not my main reason for agreeing with the majority about the need for a "like" button, but it's one reason.

[ElCid]

[/quote]


OK, I assume you are referring to me as the male?

This was not an election and there are no standards for winning or losing - that is up to the Administrators to determine. It was a recommendation by one new member who then created a poll to garner support for his recommendation. It in effect failed to gain overwhelming support, but did gain serious opposition.

There is no rule that states that the site Administrators must bow down to a poll result or recommendations from some members.

No one "won." Which means that the conversation can continue on, as you have also chosen to do.

I am sorry that this issue has caused you to consider leaving here and I hope that you, and others, do not.

Happy Holidays!
[/quote]

Yes, it's you ElCid. Your comments were harder for me to take, not because I disagree with you about the "like" button, but because I have long admired your well-reasoned comments.

The Moderator (Lomm) stated that, although disinclined to add a "like" button, if someone wanted to do a poll, "Go for it." The Moderator has already made some changes to the site, in various areas, based on just one member's suggestions. Here we have a poll, which gave all those interested an opportunity to weigh in, and enough time to consider the matter.

The thing I don't understand is why the meanness (and in one poster's case, the downright rabid nastiness) in opposing a "like" button? It would be there for those who want to use it; others can ignore it. I think the issue may be that certain people see it as an unnatural need for certain posters to garner "likes," whereas many of us see it as simply a logical way to express agreement, in those circumstances when we are not motivated, for whatever reason, to post text. Sometimes, it's just a leaner and more sensible method, and it doesn't (contrary to the views of certain people) discourage conversation.

Another Mod -- Movieman1957 -- stated that this board has managed to carry on without a "like" button since its inception. But the board is changing, and the willingness of the mods to recognize that, has been apparent. Adding a "like" button would be part of that evolution. Also, the quoting function here is cumbersome and confusing. One often doesn't know where the original poster's comments leave off, and the quoted response begins, a problem which is very confusing when there are multiple responders. That's not my main reason for agreeing with the majority about the need for a "like" button, but it's one reason.
[/quote]





Thank you for responding. Naturally I disagree and believe my comments in opposition to a like button were well-reasoned and sincere. I won't repeat them. ElCid

[LawrenceA]

You guys need to practice your quotation formatting. It's becoming a nigh-unreadable mess.

[ElCid]

You guys need to practice your quotation formatting. It's becoming a nigh-unreadable mess.

I agree. I scroll down to bottom where last quote shows, scroll few more lines and then start typing. Let's see how this one worked.